<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 50 Year Mortgages &#8211; A Compound Interest Nightmare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html</link>
	<description>Helping Smart Shoppers Save</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:19:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Minimum Wage</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html/comment-page-1#comment-627</link>
		<dc:creator>Minimum Wage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2007 05:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html#comment-627</guid>
		<description>I have no hope of buying a house.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Therefore, if I had the opportunity to take a 50-year mortgage with NO pre-payment penalty, wouldn&#039;t that be a better deal than perpetually renting?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My thinking is that with the mortgage, even though it would never get paid off until sale, I would be able to lock in my P&amp;I payment, which I consider a vast improvement over not being able to lock in anything and helplessly watching rents go up and up.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sure, it would be all interest, but at least I would lock in the payment and might even get a teeny tax break, PLUS I&#039;d capture any appreciation in the home&#039;s value, which runs circles around renting all day long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no hope of buying a house.</p>
<p>Therefore, if I had the opportunity to take a 50-year mortgage with NO pre-payment penalty, wouldn&#8217;t that be a better deal than perpetually renting?</p>
<p>My thinking is that with the mortgage, even though it would never get paid off until sale, I would be able to lock in my P&#038;I payment, which I consider a vast improvement over not being able to lock in anything and helplessly watching rents go up and up.</p>
<p>Sure, it would be all interest, but at least I would lock in the payment and might even get a teeny tax break, PLUS I&#8217;d capture any appreciation in the home&#8217;s value, which runs circles around renting all day long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html/comment-page-1#comment-620</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2007/04/50-year-mortgages-a-compound-interest-nightmare.html#comment-620</guid>
		<description>Or, assuming there is no pre-payment penalty, you could look at it another way: it simply gives you greater flexibility in how much you pay every month. If you can use an amortization calculator, it doesn&#039;t have to result in your paying interest for 50 years.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Some people don&#039;t want to be &quot;out of debt&quot; just for its own sake...for example, by investing a larger percentage of your income into your house, you not only lose opportunities to invest elsewhere for higher returns but also potentially put yourself into a dangerously undiversified situation where too large a percentage of your wealth is tied up in home equity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, assuming there is no pre-payment penalty, you could look at it another way: it simply gives you greater flexibility in how much you pay every month. If you can use an amortization calculator, it doesn&#8217;t have to result in your paying interest for 50 years.</p>
<p>Some people don&#8217;t want to be &#8220;out of debt&#8221; just for its own sake&#8230;for example, by investing a larger percentage of your income into your house, you not only lose opportunities to invest elsewhere for higher returns but also potentially put yourself into a dangerously undiversified situation where too large a percentage of your wealth is tied up in home equity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->