<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Locked In and Knocked Out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2008/11/locked-in-and-knocked-out.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2008/11/locked-in-and-knocked-out.html</link>
	<description>News for Consumers in Changing Times</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2008/11/locked-in-and-knocked-out.html/comment-page-1#comment-5032</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 21:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/?p=1834#comment-5032</guid>
		<description>Signed a contract, live by it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signed a contract, live by it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2008/11/locked-in-and-knocked-out.html/comment-page-1#comment-5025</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/?p=1834#comment-5025</guid>
		<description>I really don&#039;t like how people are referring to this as a &quot;controversy&quot;. Customers knew what they were signing up for. Paying the previously agreed cost is the sacrifice they had to make to remove uncertainty from their future heating oil payments.  This is the obvious consequence of hedging: you remove potential downside by giving up potential upside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t like how people are referring to this as a &#8220;controversy&#8221;. Customers knew what they were signing up for. Paying the previously agreed cost is the sacrifice they had to make to remove uncertainty from their future heating oil payments.  This is the obvious consequence of hedging: you remove potential downside by giving up potential upside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roth IRA FAQ, Income Streams and Financial Q &#38; A</title>
		<link>http://www.americanconsumernews.com/2008/11/locked-in-and-knocked-out.html/comment-page-1#comment-5022</link>
		<dc:creator>Roth IRA FAQ, Income Streams and Financial Q &#38; A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanconsumernews.com/?p=1834#comment-5022</guid>
		<description>[...] American Consumer News: I wasn&#8217;t aware of this, were you? There&#8217;s some controversy with oil company prepayment programs that allow customers to lock in the cost of heating oil during the winter months. As oil prices go down, some customers of these prepayment programs are stuck with their higher locked-in costs. Why lock in then? Looks like any cost savings are a wash. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] American Consumer News: I wasn&#8217;t aware of this, were you? There&#8217;s some controversy with oil company prepayment programs that allow customers to lock in the cost of heating oil during the winter months. As oil prices go down, some customers of these prepayment programs are stuck with their higher locked-in costs. Why lock in then? Looks like any cost savings are a wash. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

